'Brilliant' New Book Scientific Proof that (God The Holy) Spirit Exists by Simon Richard Lee

Scientific Proof that (God The Holy) Spirit Exists

Article Five

How (the Holy) Spirit interacts with the physical world

1. Of the Tree and Fruits of the Holy Spirit, and the Fountains of the Water of Life, as in Scripture

Overall, I was immensely reassured after I was introduced to the ‘fruits of the spirit’ described by St. Paul, that although my ‘tree of the Holy Spirit’ that I had thought up years before, was not described in detail in that way in Scripture, my ‘logical deduction of its structure’ matched Scripture. I had ‘worked it out’ in deep faith, which had now been completely exonerated by Scripture.

There was as one would expect, no complete simplistic statement that I was ‘right’ – that relies on both logic and a certain amount of inspiration – but my choice of terms of ‘Words of the Spirit’ (one might equally call them ‘seeds’), was not in any way, contradicted by the Bible. These I could readily visualise being made manifest in an, of necessity, rather diluted form in Human Beings lucky enough to be blessed or even ‘anointed by’ the Holy Spirit, with these fabulous fruits. We could not take the concentrated original form in this life!

I read too in the first letter of Paul to the Corinthians, verses 12:4 to 12:11, of the various gifts of the Spirit. Wisdom and Knowledge, and of course Faith now form the pivotal ‘Spirit of Gifts from God’ at the base of my ‘Tree of Life’ in the previous Paper. Many other references to the Holy Spirit in the Bible refer to Her as Living Water, or a Fountain of Living Water, clearly very much shaped like a tree. It is interesting to note that just as the Tree of Life of the Spirit in my previous Paper is totally based on that most rigid and strong of engineering structures, the triangle; why! so too is the fountain of water. We now know through scientific knowledge that water molecules are triangular, and water is based on structures of loosely-bonded sheets of these triangles. It is no surprise that rivers, fountains and trees follow in their shape the compelling 1-3-7 tree structure that seems to me to certainly be the most accurate representation possible of the ‘spiritual shape’ of the Sevenfold Holy Spirit.

2. Octaves, Rainbows, and the pursuit of

Enlightenment

In the present section we will be seeing how the spiritual, ‘holy’ aspects of the Universe are often made of seven parts. This might explain why seven is a ‘holy number’ in many religions.

However, these seven parts always seem to constitute an overall eighth, greater than the sum of its seven parts in its oneness and completeness – its perfection. As we will be seeing towards the end of this section, the anti-spirit of Anti-Existence is often seen to parody and imitate this natural ‘spectrum’ structure, with its own set of seven evils or sins. The eighth in this ‘counter-example’ of what I am talking about, is the ‘belief in the power of money or materialism, or above all untruth’.

In the meantime, I should like to elaborate a little on the seven-fold nature (embraced by the eighth, the ‘perfect whole’), of so many natural phenomena, even where these have apparently been invented by mankind. Important examples of these are white light, and no less than three aspects of music – tone, tonal duration, and tempo.

The latter turn out to be explicable in terms of a very mathematical set of structures, arising from musicians’ awareness of sounds as waves. The pleasing arrangement of these, and the sounds they produce, into music, can be very precisely described in terms of physics and mathematics. (Oriental, African and Aboriginal music are just as based on these natural phenomena, but employ a different tonal system. For the sake of argument, we won’t try to discuss those other forms here).

To begin then, let us consider white or ‘natural’ light. It would probably surprise a child who had never seen a rainbow, to be shown one, and then be asked what the colour is that the seven colours of the rainbow ‘add up to’. The answer of ‘white’ is probably the last one they would think of – as most of the colours in a rainbow are quite dark, they might well answer ‘black’.

This then is our first, and a prime natural example of, what I have been saying about the sum of the seven parts of a ‘spiritual currency’ adding up to a perfect holistic whole, which is more than the sum of the seven parts. Of course, it is better to talk about ‘our perception’ of seven colours adding up to an unexpected colour, ‘white’ light. (Scientists have recently shown that other creatures ‘see’ all these colours in very different ways, better suited to their way of life and natural environment).

The way in which the seven colours of light constitute one colour of ‘white’, is then really rather mysterious! The scientific explanation is rather long-winded, and far removed from our simple perception that a rainbow is beautiful!

To turn to music next, let us start with the seven tones (do, re, mi, fa, so, la, te). As any musician will tell you, these seven are incomplete without the eighth tone, a further ‘do’ (which, science tells us, is at precisely double the frequency of the initial ‘do’). In this way many such ‘octaves’ are used in music, all joined in series by a doubling in frequency of their “do’s”.

In practice, the human brain and ear can only appreciate about eight such octaves, centred around the note of ‘middle C’ (with a frequency of 256 Hertz. One Hertz is one beat per second, and 256 is also a power of two). So, tone in music is completely based around octaves, which in turn each correspond to a doubling of frequency. Likewise, and in an even more obvious fashion, tempo and musical periods (tonal duration) also work on a basis of a multiplication or division by powers of two – 2, 4, or 8.

Digital computers also work on the latter basis (normally based on the next higher power of two after eight, which is sixteen, or ‘hexadecimal’). As a result, in the last twenty years, it has been relatively easy for computer programmers to introduce ‘musical computers’, that now dominate at least the modern music scene. On a personal note, I still prefer to hear the skill and flair – despite the inevitable occasional slip – of traditional players of the original musical instruments!

For my third example of ‘spiritual currencies’ in groups of seven, I vividly recall the early days of evolving the ideas in this paper, in 1978. Initially I was trying to find a basis for a meeting of the seven main world faiths, which was as I saw them, and searched for their ‘lowest common denominator’, which soon I discovered to be the ‘Ground of Existence’.

In a similar way, the state of being an Enlightened Person (an ‘Arahant’), is often talked of as having seven ‘planes’. The Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, described the most ‘natural’ way to this blissful state of mind as comprising an eight-fold path! More on this subject of Enlightenment is to be found in the next section of this paper.

Perhaps I should not be too surprised, with my training in computer science, by the fact that 1, 3 and 7 are ‘holy’ numbers in many religions; yet 8 is a far easier number than 7 to manipulate or incorporate in drawings. After all, eight is a simple power of two (2x2x2), whereas seven is both odd and prime.

In the previous Paper, the three numbers 1, 3, and 7 correspond to the three levels of the tree structure that I drew of ‘God the Spirit’ or ‘The Holy Spirit’. The ‘One-ness’ of this natural ‘essence’, prevalent throughout the Universe (according to Christian belief), seems to arise, yet again, as an eighth, a perfect whole that transcends the sum of its components.

The power of ‘Anti-Existence’ or ‘Satan’ seems to have parodied this spiritual, ‘holy’ notion of an overall ‘eighth with seven parts’, in the form of the ‘seven deadly sins’. In the case of these seven, the eighth is an obsession with, and belief in the power of, matter – materialism, and possibly being a ‘money junkie’. In the case of instances of this particular 7/8 combination, they are totally self-destructive in nature.

An excess of one or more of the seven causes a strong desire for more of the eighth, which in turns increases the power of the seven in a person’s life. This ‘vicious circle’ is addictive, obsessive, and very hard to break – and usually leads to calamity. Hence, as Jesus said:

‘A man cannot serve both God and mammon; for he will always love the one and hate the other’.

3. Enlightenment and Conversion

There is at first glance a great deal of difference between Western and Eastern Religions. The major faiths of the Western World, Judaism, Christianity and Islam, all place great emphasis on the interaction of the individual with a very personal ‘Lord God’. In the case of Christianity, this interaction is seen as also taking place with two other Persons, of the Messiah (Jesus), and of the Holy Ghost. The great traditions in the Eastern World, of Buddhism in many parts of the Far East, Hinduism in India, and Taoism in China, are by contrast mostly philosophical rather than emphasising a ‘personal God’.

However, this philosophical emphasis, which operates at the ‘official core’, as it were, of each of the three, often seems to the Western eye to ‘break down’, with Hindus and Taoists worshipping a multiplicity of Gods. The Hindu religion also contains the mythology of the ‘demi-gods’ Krishna and Arjuna, and various other sons and daughters of ‘Brahman’. (Brahman is the Hindu equivalent of ‘the Most High’, ‘the Lord God’ or ‘Allah’ in Western tradition. He is the only God that the priests, or Brahmins, of Hinduism officially recognise or advocate worship of). Ordinary Buddhists too, worship shrines, ‘holy places’, and statues of the Buddha, in a way very different to the basic precepts of Buddhism (as taught by the Buddha).

Yet is there any real difference here between East and West? The Catholic Church, for instance, often regarded as the ‘original’ Christian Church, tolerates the kissing of statues of Saints, even though the Bible frequently expresses God’s abhorrence at similar practices in biblical times. So there often appears to be a ‘double life’ between principles and practice in both Eastern and Western religion. The only reference point for resolving such issues is the Holy Book or Holy Books of these religions, or to an inherently less trustworthy, nor as repeatable extent, truly reliable interpretation.

I will be returning to this subject in due course, but will leave it there for now. The real purpose of this section is to explore how adherents of the two broad classes of ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ religions come to be accepted into their faiths, which to over-simplify I will be calling ‘Enlightenment’ and ‘Conversion’ respectively.

The only ‘unifying principle’ I will apply at this point is that this acceptance is not at all affected by being born into any particular Religion, either of East or West. I will be taking a somewhat purist approach, and looking at how someone in the West becomes a true ‘Man of Faith’ rather than just claiming this by some obscure ‘right of birth. Similarly, how someone in the East fully comes to terms with the true meaning of the philosophical system they were born into and have since chosen to adhere to, and becomes ‘Enlightened’.

The purpose of the present section is to explore the similarities and differences between the approaches in the East and West to these two. I re-introduce below from the previous Paper, my picture or diagram of the Seven Spirits of the Holy Spirit, which I will be using as a ‘model’ in this section, and much of the rest of this paper. In the current section, only the shape of the ‘Tree of Seven Spirits’ is shown, with the Original Paradox being given its Eastern name of the ‘Ground of Existence’:

To take the rather easier, and probably more familiar concept of Christian Conversion first, this can probably best be conveniently summarised as, in a nutshell:

‘Passing a threshold of knowing and trusting the Lord (or Jesus), sufficiently to want to go on getting to know, trusting and serving Him, and increasingly emulating Him, better and better for the rest of your life’.

Most Buddhists and Hindus, to again take the two philosophies or religions from the East that I am most familiar with, normally regard Enlightenment as a breakthrough onto a sort of ‘Plateau of Wisdom’. Here you are totally familiar and at home with the ‘dharmakaya’ (the word is the same in both religions), of the Buddha in Buddhism, and Brahman in Hinduism.

At first sight the ‘Worship of the Person of God (or Jesus)’, and ‘supreme knowledge of dharmakaya’ (a principle), seem worlds apart. This, combined with the geographical separation of Eastern and Western religions, seems to have been a great hindrance to dialogue between them in the past. However, once Christians adopt the somewhat unfamiliar notion of the ‘Ground of Existence’, as explored in the previous paper, the phrase ‘Word of God’ as St John’s term for it should provide the means of a breakthrough. It does indeed!

In the first chapter of his gospel, John, in any translation of the Bible, is saying that Jesus was the ‘Ground of Existence’ (or ‘Word of God’), In Person. In a similar way the Buddha was an incarnation of dharmakaya, so they are Western and Eastern incarnations, respectively, of the same Principle. Both religions regard their founding figures as immortal.

4. The relationships between the Ground of Existence, the Holy Spirit, Time, Space, matter and Life.

The Bible’s diverse comments on the Holy Spirit mostly appear in the Gospels and the Book of Revelation; the latter is where I made the crucial discovery that there were seven spirits ‘within’ the Holy Spirit. I then pieced together these different comments, using mostly common-sense (my observations of the Holy Spirit in everyday life) to complete the picture. As I hinted in section one of this paper, GOD completes the tree by being an ‘Eighth who encapsulates and cements the Seven Spirits’.

Science does not usually concern itself with the Holy Spirit or the Ground of Existence, leaving that realm to theologians. However, in the previous Paper we have seen how physicists will almost certainly have to address this issue, if science as a whole wants to make further progress.

A ‘second level’ is the rather more familiar Space. It is impossible to overestimate the importance of the interaction between the fabric of space-time, and the support provided to it throughout the Universe by the Holy Spirit, and above all the Ground of Existence. How does one imagine a ‘curvature of space-time’, as proposed necessary by Relativity, without a ‘background’ against which such curvature can take place and exist?

We saw above how God plays a ‘unifying’ rôle around the Holy Spirit and the Ground of Existence. God is by definition ever-present everywhere in the Universe, in an ‘omnipresent way’ at the first two levels of this Cosmology. All the vast reaches of space are supported everywhere, all the time, by the Holy Spirit which is based on the Original Paradox, the Ground of Existence. God acts as the ‘totality’ of both, the ‘holistic whole’ (which is greater than the sum of its constituent parts taken separately).

The final Level is the most familiar one, of matter, and food chains of creatures contained in the cycle of life and death. Here scientists are happiest; although by far the greatest emphasis of all religions is on Life (especially mankind), they don’t worry nearly so much about the nature of matter as the sciences do. Here, in the topmost Level, God’s rôle is that of the Life of ‘life and death’, and the Determiner of their Cycle. So God is the ‘Totality’ of each of the Three Levels, a Three-in-One Totality.

5. How do the Laws of Physics come to actually be applied?

Physicists, as well as usually avoiding what they regard as ‘theological’ issues, also generally avoid the issue of just why the Laws of Physics come to be applied the same way at every point in the known Universe, which is left to philosophers. The rôle of physicists, they say, is to aim for a complete mathematical, theoretical description of how the laws of physics are applied. You have already seen many examples of how I dislike such ‘guarding of territories’, and often cross between them! In this section I will be looking at the very question of just why the laws of physics come to be applied so uniformly everywhere, all the time.

Furthermore, in my two chosen examples of two physical Principles, I will be suggesting a deeper reason for their existence than physics provides, yet that can be expressed in everyday language rather than that of higher mathematics.

The first of these two examples, which both emanate from Quantum Theory, is Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. If I first give the outline of the mathematical statement of this once revolutionary Principle, then interpret it in terms of the ‘model’ developed in this paper, you should see what I mean.

In taking a measurement of anything, there are always practical limits to the accuracy of the measurement. However precise your measuring device, there is always a limit to the number of digits in a given reading that can be trusted. The Uncertainty Principle says a number of profound things. Firstly physical properties in the Universe usually come in pairs, and if you try to measure these two complementary opposite properties (for instance, pairs of opposing forces or momentum and size) of the same object or wave, and so on, simultaneously, a curious thing happens. If you find one measurement is highly accurate, the other is in turn made less accurate, in inverse proportion of ‘errors of measurement’. The accuracy of both measurements has to be extremely high for this to become obvious, yet it has been verified countless times by physicists.

The second main theme that Heisenberg’s Principle presents, is really a consequence of the first, and constitutes how it is normally interpreted. This is that any ‘experiment’ is affected by the presence of the ‘observer’, the person or persons conducting that experiment. Hence the Universe is no longer seen as objective!

However physicists apparently make no use of any concept of the ‘holding up by’ the Holy Spirit of the rest of the Universe, and how She – or they – interacts with the Universe. The answer provided by my ‘model’ is exquisitely simple.

The Original Paradoxes of the Ground of Existence and the Holy Spirit serve to separate all opposites; and stand outside the passage of elapsed time itself, Chronos, but continually interacting with ‘time in motion’ or Kairos – that of the Lord God! - continually supporting the fabric of the Universe and Space itself, everywhere, intelligently. It is this ‘effortless action’ that provides a simple basis for understanding both main interpretations of the Uncertainty Principle, with pairs of measurements being connected in this way, and the Observer/Observed Experiment pair.

That is, if one ‘pokes the Universe’ too hard, the intelligence of the Holy Spirit will respond! The purpose of this is to prevent anybody, except God alone, from being able to predict anything completely, i.e. to know the future!

There is another reason why the Ground of Existence opposes the ‘Anti-Dimension’ through the Uncertainty Principle. If any creature ever did succeed in measuring one of a complementary pair of quantities (as paired by physics) to an infinite degree, the other would become infinitely ‘smeared’, and the fundamental ‘symmetry’ of the two complementary qualities would break down.

Such a state of affairs has been exhaustively explored by Professor Stephen Hawking in his theories of ‘black holes’. In a ‘black hole’, certain properties of matter are so incredibly tightly constrained or fixed, that others ‘blow up’. Such a state of affairs would represent a ‘local victory’ for the ‘Anti-Dimension’, and its creation of a local ‘anti-sphere of influence’. Reassuringly perhaps, Professor Hawking’s equations indicate that all such black holes would eventually ‘explode’.

The second Principle we discuss in this section is again from Quantum Mechanics, and is the Pauli Exclusion Principle. At the level of sub-atomic ‘particles’ (sometimes known, because of the ‘wave-particle duality’, as ‘wavicles’, and more recently, as ‘strings’), matter can surprisingly be categorised by just a handful of quantised quantities.

‘Quantised’ means ‘comes in one of a discrete set of levels, rather than on a smooth scale’.

Not surprisingly, at this minute scale, these properties are very different to the ‘large-scale’, everyday behaviour of matter. Such properties include a unique discrete ‘energy level’, and angular momentum (similar to everyday angular momentum of rotation, but simultaneously quantised, and ‘smeared’ by the effect of the Uncertainty Principle). Another property is ‘spin’, related to angular momentum, but very different to the everyday notion of spin (for an excellent description of spin, refer to Professor Hawking’s ‘A brief history of time’).

The Exclusion Principle is very simple, like the Uncertainty Principle. It says that no two particles in a ‘local region’, like the electrons ‘orbiting’ the nucleus of an atom, can ever both have the same set of values of this handful of quantum properties. It is similar to the unwritten principle of biology that no two creatures, even of the same family, are ever exactly identical (even identical twins have different fingerprints).

In the terms of my ‘Model’, this seems to imply a Principle of the Ground of Existence that could be called a ‘Uniqueness Principle’. Its Purpose can be summarised by the saying, ‘variety is the spice of life’. It serves to ensure that,

The Uniqueness Principle

‘Even when only by virtue of their separation in space and time, particles, atoms, molecules and above all living creatures (and even the creations of mankind, such as machines), are all always uniquely identifiable by God’.

The opposing Principle of the ‘Anti-Dimension’ forever tries to create ‘clones’ of the same creature or entity. Yet God abhors clones!

6. Principles of the Reality Of Everything Spiritual – as well as just Material (PROESM)

Heaven Life

New Jerusalem Messianic

(bride of Messiah) Spirit

Comfort Hope Truth Way

Spirit of all prophetesses and Spirit of all prophets and all feminine spiritual gifts all masculine spiritual gifts

Grace Peace

Endurance Pity

Kindness Patience Justice Forgiveness

Beauty Health(integrity)

Courage Mercy

Elegance Colour Sensitivity Self-Control

Joy

Love Generosity

Creativity Delight Humour

Tenderness Desire

THE HOLY SPIRIT - a Tree of Life, Her fruit containing the ‘seeds’ of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil

Wisdom Sophia (fruit) Reason JHWH(Jealousy for)

Knowledge Faith Female Male

Terra Firma

Uriel(intuition) Gabriel(communication) Michael(righteousness)

Centre Centre Centre

Forward Back Up Down Right Left

Raphael(healing)

Present Tempus Vernum

Future Past

The incredibly powerfully symmetrical, hence very strong, cosmic egg structure containing all the groups of four heavily sexual Fundamental Spiritual Qualities in my Summary Diagram above is crucial to what follows. I give below a short summary of this structure, as the very ‘key’ to all ‘Spiritual Energies’. First an interpretative diagram: -

COSMIC EGG or ‘SPIRITRON’ - Male or Female

Nature or Holistic ‘Quality’ of the given Cosmic Egg or ‘fruit’ – Sexual bias of Quality as that of the Central Cosmic Sperm. Nature determined by the combined Natures of the Proposer and the Surrender – and is the ‘dialectic’ or Quality of their Flow.

‘Climax’ or ‘Surrender’ ‘Initiator’ or ‘Proposer’

always FEMALE always MALE

We return to the above diagram again and again in this paper. Suffice it to say it took me all of 22 years to 1999 to work out the basis of the very simplistic structure of the female ‘Spiritual Cosmic Egg’ above. I now have as never before a very clear picture why women are three times exactly as complex as us mere men! Then just two years to 2001 when I wrote this piece to realise that the overall picture was simply chicken and egg. The ‘masculine sperm or nucleus’ took just 1/11^th as long to investigate.

Finally in this section I now add, with ‘a bit of a flourish’, the only two main types of world faith, both ancient, which I have deliberately left off so far for the sake of simplicity of my ‘master diagram’. Once you turn the page onto the following sections of this hopefully fascinating as well as terse but comprehensive paper, you may well start to think ‘yes, there really is something to this eccentric development of ideas’. We start this transformation of the foot of my diagram by repeating it unchanged: -

Terra Firma

Uriel(intuition) Gabriel(communication) Michael(righteousness)

Centre Centre Centre

Forward Back Up Down Right Left

Raphael(healing)

Present Tempus Vernum

Future Past

Note that for deliberate reasons, I have shown the four ‘qualities’ of space and time with names of the only – and corresponding – Angels actually named anywhere in the – exclusively Western – Bible! Michael and Gabriel are probably both familiar names of Archangels. Gabriel is really female!

Their counterparts Raphael and female Uriel only appear in the ‘apocryphal’, ‘central’ books in complete e.g. Roman Catholic bibles. We now see that these have precise equivalences to whole Faiths in the Far East, even to the fine detail of the symbols usually identified with these four Faiths or Philosophies. These, finally, perhaps astonishingly, correspond to the four great ‘opposites’ of both the ancient East and West, fire, air, earth and water: -

Terra Firma

Hinduism (intuition) Buddhism(communication) Confucianism(morality)

- Fire - - Air - - Earth-

Centre Centre Centre

Forward Back Up Down Right Left

Taoism(healing)

- Water -

Present Tempus Vernum

Future Past

Finally, all we have to do is conjure up a way to include the faiths of human sacrificing, pyramid-building agriculturists like the Pharaohs/Aztecs, as well as the aboriginal ‘hunter/gatherers’. By a mysterious process, this ends any confusion you may still have, over whether there are a total of 54 or 56 ‘Fundamental Spiritual Qualities’ - in the final picture about to emerge. In the diagram below, the baffling three centres are each shared by three faiths - so the above two totals need to grow – delightfully in my view to a DEFINITIVE SIXTY-FOUR such Qualities.

‘Delightful’ as 64 is 2x2x2x2x2x2 – simplicity!

Agriculture(e.g. Abel)

Sacrifice

First-rate engineering Irrigation

(using TRIANGLES hence

pyramid-building!)

Terra Firma

Hinduism (intuition) Buddhism(communication) Confucianism(morality)

- Fire - - Air - - Earth -

Centre Centre Centre

Forward Back Up Down Right Left

Taoism(healing)

- Water -

Present Tempus Vernum

Future Past

Nomadism(e.g. Cain)

Nature-worship

Food Gathering Hunting

7. The very structure of ‘QUARKS’

In 1994 I gave myself a thorough refresher course in Christianity. At one particular crisis breaking point on 16^th March 1994 I prayed for and instantly knew I had indeed been given the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. This climax to becoming a full Christian - even though I have since rarely felt the need to attend Church - has resulted in: -

· a fluent ‘Middle Eastern, rather flowery’ Gift of Tongues

· a full Gift of Healing by Laying on of Hands

· to add to my existing Gifts of Words of Faith, Words of Knowledge, and Prophecy – through premonitions supplied by ‘Jungian dreams’!

To summarise the Bible itself on the ‘Start of all Things’ –

“In the beginning was God and Spirit”

paraphrase of Genesis I:1-2, opening the Old Testament

“In the beginning was God and the Word”

paraphrase of John I:1, in the New Testament

Simple, obvious conclusions: -

‘ALL LANGUAGE IS MADE OF PURE SPIRIT ’

“THOUGHT IS COMPOSED OF WORDS i.e. SPIRIT”

The quark’s structure is that of the ‘cosmic egg’… This explains all quark properties as being of SPIRIT! Indeed the two diagrams overleaf represent a crucial section of this whole paper, being my own attempt to rationalise the proposition of the latest ‘string theories’ (there are five of them, currently being knitted by eminent physicists into one overall ‘M-theory’ or ‘Mother theory’) that there are in fact quite a few ‘unseen’ dimensions of space and time! My first diagram overleaf illustrates my claim that these ‘unseen’ dimensions are in fact spiritual – six of them, making up the ‘branches’ of an overall encapsulating seventh ‘Spirit of Wisdom’. That makes a total of seven spiritual + three of space + and one of time dimensions – not including matter. The latter one dimension comes dramatically into the second parallel diagram overleaf. Having postulated that there are in fact seven extra ‘spiritual’ dimensions to space and time; which are constrained by space and time within space and time so entirely ‘rolled up inside them’ just as string theory says; my second diagram completes the overall picture trying to justify the claims of string theorists of multiple dimensions. It shows how the same four ‘poles’ – the eight paired ‘gluons’ of quark theory – of space and time – constrain the ‘strings’ that make up the six types of ‘quark’ postulated to make up all fundamental particles. In an analogous way to the ‘six spirits’ of the first diagram, below; which I find very exciting!

I. A spiritual model of 'the Universe when very small' - eleven dimensions of the total of twelve - not containing matter, only spiritual energy as throughout this paper

{HEIGHT}

Down Up

Love Joy Grace

Past Future

{Time}

Health Peace

Left Fore

Right Back

{WIDTH} {DEPTH}

Beauty

All of the ELEVEN spiritual dimensions are at right angles to each other and under minute and massive tension from their light and gravity waves. Approximately 10³⁹tonnes, according to ‘Theories of Everything’!

1. This structure can be seen to be composed of three ‘curved’ equal-sided (‘equilateral’) triangles – fitting perfectly with current theories of quarks – that it takes THREE taken together to form one fundamental particle.

2. We see that the Universe is really twelve-dimensional. With one material dimension and all of eleven spiritual dimensions. That is:- 11/12 = 91 2/3 % = 91.666 666 … % comprising spiritual energy i.e. DARK MATTER!

4. These 11 dimensions contain God’s mind, i.e. the long sought-after cosmic consciousness (a living 'computer' inside each and every particle): -

Ø The force of nature

Ø The laws of science - imposed from inside each particle

Ø The Holy Spirit

Ø The triple membrane of space - and the ‘spring of time’.

Ø Which are all tantamount to the same eleven-fold Set of Spiritual Energies. These fill the whole Universe - making us all; and everything material – ‘Figments of God’s Reality’!

II. A postulated model of fundamental particle STRUCTURE intended to provide a coherent basis for the 'quark theory' based on the spiritual model of 'the Universe in the tiny / dark matter' on the previous page

{HEIGHT GLUON PAIR}

Down Up

Place for Place for Place for TOP

UP quarks DOWN quarks Quarks

(2/3e) (-1/3e) (2/3e)

W+ mesons

Z mesons

W- mesons Past Future The "Weak

Time {Time GLUON PAIR} Force"

Place for Place for

STRANGENESS BOTTOM

Quarks(-1/3e) Quarks(-1/3e)

Left Fore

Right Back

{WIDTH {DEPTH

GLUON Place for GLUON

PAIR} CHARM quarks (2/3e) PAIR }

On the previous page I proposed that 'dark matter' of physics today is comprised of something very familiar from the very apparently different world of FAITH – Spirit (-ual Energy in seven/eleven dimensions) or in particular, the HOLY SPIRIT. The problems are still vast, of what dark matter is, what goes to make it up, and how much of it there is in the Universe (in order to explain the properties of the Universe as observed by scientists' thousands of telescopes and predicted by their many very sophisticated theories). So my views expressed here are just as valid, and possibly may turn out to be more or less so, than any of the multitude of other theories floating around the scientific world at present.

A good place to look for the latest information on dark matter and the particles supposed to make it up (the 'quarks, gluons, etc' of the above diagram) is the Internet. However, be warned, when I did a search for 'dark matter' on the 'Google' search engine it returned nearly one and a half MILLION web-sites with information. Luckily after a few looks at the earlier of these in the search, I found the web-site of the University of California Riverside, and two FAQ pages there, delightfully under two pages A4 each, yet adequately summarising the world of dark matter - and 'the particle zoo': -

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/dark_matter.html

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/particle_zoo.html

The Particle Data Book, one of the main reference books of modern physics, lists an initially intimidating 150+ different particles. Fortunately, the now largely fully accepted 'quark model' greatly simplified this forest in the 1960's, even though individual quarks are too tightly 'bound' to each other by vast forces ('other smaller particles') to be observed separately. The quark model proposes that all particles are composed of a far smaller range of three 'generations' of two quarks each, plus two other types of particle per generation, i.e. twelve basic particles including six types of quark, each with a corresponding antiparticle. Radiation 'particles' with no matter in them form a second fundamental group of 'most fundamental particles', called 'gauge bosons': -

FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES OF MATTER

Charge

-1 electron muon tauon

0 electron neutrino nu(e) mu neutrino nu(mu) tau neutrino nu(tau)

-1/3 down quark strange quark bottom quark

2/3 up quark charm quark top quark

GAUGE BOSONS

Charge Force

0 photon electromagnetism

0 gluons (8 of them) strong force

+-1 W+ and W- weak force

0 Z weak force

This 'quark' model of particles as related to my two earlier diagrams

1. The core feature of each diagram is the correlation of the four dimensions of the space time continuum, taken in pairs of extremes of height, width, depth and time, to the eight gluons, taken in four pairs bound together. As far as I know, this proposal that gluons work in tightly-bound pairs (held by enormous forces) and that they correspond directly to the four dimensions of space and time, is wholly new. It is a very good way, as I see it to explain how the quarks and spiritual energies that they can contain at their core as hidden 'dark matter', can be bound together by the gluons so strongly - for these comprise the very fabric or membrane of the space-time continuum! The gluons then, serve as rigid 'poles' for standing waves made up of energy flowing between them - of vast energy.

2. Quarks come in three 'generations' shown across the table above. Up and down quarks, electrons and electron neutrinos make up everyday matter; the second and third generations are more 'exotic' and increasingly so, and more massive. Likewise, 'joy and love' as spirits are very familiar, almost commonplace to us, with the media constantly blasting them out. 'Health and beauty', the equivalent in the spiritual world to second generation quarks, are much harder to attain; and the 'third generation' of Peace and Grace is virtually unheard of, increasingly so. No wonder Christians say that Jesus had to die on the Cross in great suffering to introduce these two to the world as concepts; and that because He was the Son of God and therefore totally pure, and so innocent of his 'crime', that God was able by the Rules of Good and Evil at War to resurrect Him!

3. The sign of the 'charge' of quarks in the second diagram corresponds directly to the sexual gender of the corresponding spiritual energy as in the first diagram and others in this paper. The magnitude of the charge of 'feminine' quarks in this view is simply due to the fact that they are twice as far from the central axis as their male (negative charge) counterparts. Twice as complex, being female?

4. Each quark's antiparticle can be seen to arise if its 'direction' between the two gluons holding it in as a wave/particle is reversed and the antiparticle comes about. This can also be seen to happen if any two of the outermost 'spatial' gluon pairs are swapped in position as a 'pair of pairs'.

5. To carry on the parallels between physics and faith, is the 'weak force' actually equivalent to 'the Godhead'?

time Ariel

(Isaiah’s name for Jerusalem)

W- - Spirit of all prophetesses

Messianic Spirit n.b. Jesus

- Spirit of all Prophets

Z Sophia – Anima or Wife of God

W+ Jealousy – Most High Lord God

“What!” I hear a billion, especially Western, religious fanatics cry! “He’s gone and blasphemed - and called ‘our’ God ‘JEALOUS’! We know His Name is Allah, JHWH, or Jehovah, Yahweh, etc., etc.!”

I quote the Bible in my absolute defence: -

"For you shall worship no other God, because the LORD,

whose Name is Jealous, is a jealous God"

Exodus 34:14

The Old Testament

6. I suggest strongly that there was originally just ONE ‘QUARK’ in the Big Bang – the FATHER ‘QUARK’ – which divided to produce the WORD and the LAW. This HOLY TRINITY then divided further to produce the whole evolution of the Universe to date – ‘assisted evolution’ that is! The cosmos is an energy dance of quadrillions and zillions of such quarks, each one containing a unique set of spiritual energy LANGUAGES.

7. The lines and arcs of circles in each diagram each correspond to 'strings' as in 'string theories' - and demonstrate a way in which the Universe is TWELVE-dimensional - a fact needed in any theory of everything to explain all four forces of nature; weak, strong, gravity & electromagnetism.

8. The ‘cosmic egg pattern’ explains why not just how waves work

There are (at least) three basic types of wave motion described by physics, with very different mathematical bases for how they arise: -

1. ‘Everyday’ waves like sound, and water waves like ripples and ocean waves. These all involve an interchange of energy with matter, the energy alternating between ‘potential’ and ‘kinetic’ energy.

2. Waves that can exist without any matter e.g. light, which can travel through a vacuum.

3. Waves due to the quantum mechanical notion of particles of matter having a ‘wave particle duality’ – covered more in the next section.

It is not the purpose of a purely qualitative paper like this, to offer any solution to the problem of any ‘grand unification’ of the mathematics of these – all very different types of wave – a target of physicists for decades! Rather, instead of trying to present a set of mathematical symbols trying in any way to unify physical descriptions of these three basic types of wave, I will be taking a totally qualitative – indeed, spiritual – view! However, by doing so, I will be offering a valid reason why waves are so fundamental in nature.

To quote from earlier in this part of the paper: -

“A physical dimension (like mass, length or time) is precisely equivalent to a ‘fundamental spirit’ ”

So, rather than delve into the – essentially mathematical and symbolic – nature of physical waves, we instead look now at how the ‘cosmic egg structure’ throughout this paper, describes two ‘spiritual waves’, Joy and Love:

LOVE Joy

CREATIVITY Generosity

TENDERNESS Desire DELIGHT Humour

The four components of each ‘egg’ can be summarised as follows: -

Female-biased ‘process’ Male-biased ‘urge’ male source female climax

Love Creativity Desire Tenderness

Joy Generosity Humour Delight

Summarising these, again in words, rather than any awkward mathematics:

“The urge to be generous - in Spirit - causes Joy i.e. Humour causing Delight”.

“The urge for creativity leads to Love – i.e. the Desire for Tenderness’.

We can clearly see from the diagrams above, how the essentially circular or cyclical nature of waves has a ‘spiritual’ basis – in these and all ‘cosmic eggs’ as in this paper. Start propelling the circular (‘feminine’) ‘shell’ around – and along - the central (‘male-biased’) axis or nucleus, and the familiar ‘sine-wave’ or basic ‘simple harmonic motion’ of a wave as in a spring or pendulum, immediately emerges.

Yet I have claimed throughout this paper, that such ‘spiritual cosmic eggs’ have a distinct ‘echo’ as the basis of many physical phenomena. Here if we translate this spiritual concept from the seven ‘spiritual dimensions’ within quarks, to the four of space-time, with the final twelfth dimension of matter also being involved in the first type of physical wave discussed at the start of this section, a very reason for waves emerges!

Finally, let us turn to deal with a common feature of modern attempts to divine a ‘fundamental basis for many aspects of reality’ as discussed here. Namely that many aspects of nature (details of God’s Creation?) follow a spiral pattern. This can readily be explained if the energy of the ‘central urge’ as above, and other ‘dimensions’ (spiritual and physical) tends to grow, fuelling the wave involved. More of this in later sections…

9. Just why atoms with their nucleus and orbiting electrons exist in that ‘spiral-shaped’ way

Firstly, an obvious remark, to any physicist or chemist reading this. The shape of the ’cosmic egg structure’ of this paper is identical to that of the simplest atom, or structure of negatively-charged electron(s) circling a positively-charged nucleus made of positive protons and neutral neutrons, i.e. the hydrogen atom: -

More generally, for increasingly complex types of atom, according to ‘traditional’ quantum mechanical models of atoms, the orbiting electrons are best represented as ‘charge fields’ which describe the ‘chance or probability of finding an actual electron at a particular place at a particular time’.

Previous work has shown that such discussion is anathema to me! Rather I see each electron orbiting a nucleus in any atom as above, as uniquely subject to its own individual ‘copy of the laws of physics’ within its share of 11 spiritual ‘dimensions’ inside its material shell. Hence, all the probability and statistics of quantum-mechanical descriptions of atoms – and the fundamental particles they contain – could be eliminated if the deterministic model I proposed in section 2, of the even more basic and fundamental ‘quarks’, proves correct – or something very similar…

10. The ‘cosmic egg pattern’ explains the hot core, mantle, and shape and rotation of: - Planets, Moons, Stars, Solar Systems, and whole Galaxies

I now skip out completely a vast ‘level of complexity’ or area of science – chemistry, largely the studies of how atoms of different sorts combine together or react. We move on to larger, more ‘singular’ rather than ‘plural or molecular’ objects – astronomical ones.

Firstly, let us consider that the basis of planets, moons and stars is all of a ‘hot’, ‘masculine’ core within a ‘cool’, ‘feminine’ mantle or outer shell, rather like in atoms, which are far smaller. Also based on the ‘cosmic egg’:

Is the rotation of all these astronomical bodies, apart significantly from our own Earth’s moon, due to rotational impulses arising from the structure of the sum total of all their individual quarks above?

Secondly, how do we account for the Earth having existed for four or five billion years, according to astrophysicists, yet still has not been totally destroyed? Is the central, core, ‘cosmic intelligence’ of quarks, indeed going together to form a ‘Mind of God’ preventing such a catastrophe?

Solar systems such as our own, are clearly modelled on the ‘cosmic egg structure’, with a hot core (the Sun) encircled by the elliptical orbits of numerous planets, comets, asteroids and other heavenly bodies, very similar to atoms with surrounding electrons. Except that the motions of planets etc. around any star are governed by Newton’s famous inverse-square law of gravitation, and by no ‘statistical’ quantum mechanics of the very small!

Finally on this ‘giant scale of things’, galaxies are usually spiral in shape. This, in my model, must correspond to a constant discharge of energy into the galaxy, making its ‘cosmic egg’ grow along the spiralling growth lines outlined earlier. As we said there, the spiral seems to be a common feature of a twelve-dimensional Universe. The reason? Added energy makes ‘cosmic eggs’ expand steadily along all their dimensions, spiritual as well as material.

So, how do the world’s Holy Books answer scientific evidence that the Universe is around 15,000,000,000 years old, not just about 6,000-12,000 years as in say, the Bible? Let the Bible itself answer: -

‘...with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day.’

2 Peter 3:8

The New Testament in the Bible

11. Just why eggs, plants, trees, structures based on them like blood and nerve supplies, and so ultimately brains themselves come about in their particular way!

The very phrase ‘cosmic egg structure’ tells you at once the inspiration for the main theme of this paper – is the ‘egg and sperm’ basis of nearly all sexual reproduction in nature. So far we have seen very many examples of how this most fundamental aspect of the Creation – or Nature – seems to apply to so many levels of that Creation or Nature. So we move on promptly to look at how an important aspect of the diagram in section eight, relates totally to so many aspects of biology. Namely the binary ‘Tree of Life’ shown there.

Binary is the operative expression, for nearly all trees and plants in zoology, and blood and nerve supplies in organisms, divide in like binary fashion virtually 100% of the time. As in the skeletal form below of the original ‘Tree of Life’ that can

only be said to be their original spiritual inspiration: -

This ‘Tree of Life’ structure, ultimately, can be seen, simplistically, to be the very basis of all brains, with as you recall, Wisdom, Reason and the ‘Notion of Godhead’ at the base, the brainstem. Exactly as in nature.

It would be fascinating to discover if the diagram of the ‘Tree of Life’ in section six in fact turned out to be an accurate map or phrenology of the brain, especially the human brain! The Victorians sought such a ‘map of the brain’ – but my own is based solidly on spiritual and scriptural principles!

Scientific Proof that (God The Holy) Spirit Exists

Article Six

The Spiritual Nature of DNA Creation v. evolution

1. Introduction. The Spiritual Nature of DNA and RNA

The 'molecules of life', DNA and RNA, operate in a hugely complex fashion, as revealed by the 'Human Genome Project'. Yet even that complexity is still far too limited to explain the human form, and above all the brain - and the bare incredible fact of our individual consciousness!

This Article challenges scientists to embrace the ideas here. To include vital notions of a 'secret spiritual life of DNA' - my own extension to their current theories that are based only on biochemistry. I argue that 'proteins are the glue between thoughts and the body', and that there are spiritual and mental components to the amino acids that make up proteins. I put the radical view that these contain spiritual energies, not just chemicals.

My own new theory argues that without these hidden spiritual components, it is impossible to claim that human beings are constructed by about just 44,000 types of protein, as the current theories argue. Computers have negative IQ and are so completely 'dumb'. Yet your average Personal Computer requires many more different component parts than that. The vastly more complex, self-contained, conscious human obviously needs hugely many more…

My own case is that spiritual energy in its hidden dimensions must accompany the bio-chemicals of DNA and RNA. By virtue of the massive information and intelligence in these spiritual energies, they could be shown by full research to explain human and animal complexity in full - even brains!

I wrote these three papers from my point of view of a fully trained scientist, trying to develop a 'Science of the Spirit' - and so the Mind. The '21^st Century Spiritual Psychology' that has emerged, tries to take everything that the Bible - and other Holy Books - has to say on the subject, as far as I am concerned. These papers organise that set of information - which many billions of people around the world - 'believers' - would take as 'The Truth', into a scientific framework. This in turn enabled me throughout to consistently refer the 'Model of The Human and Holy Spirits' that I have been able to develop, against the latest scientific theories. As we have seen, astonishingly perhaps, they totally match!

As for science, its approach is different - fundamentally. A key feature of the vast majority of science is that it endeavours to be 'objective'. Scientific theories deliberately exclude the effect of the mind and spirit from what their 'approximations to truth' say about the nature of the very complex world we live in. This brings us to the second key difference between the Two Worlds of Faith and Science. People with a faith always argue that they seek The Truth - usually found in their religion's particular Holy Book or Books. For instance, the purest form of Christianity is one that relies only on an (accurate) translation of the Bible - together with inspiration from Spirit - the Holy Spirit.

It is precisely because scientific theories have no notion of Mind or Spirit, apart from more recent quantum mechanical ones like Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, that true scientists only ever claim that their theories are not 'The Truth' - merely 'an APPROXIMATION to "truth"'. There is no notion as in Faith, of 'Absolute Truth' in pure, correctly applied science!

I followed the dramatic decoding of the entire length of the human 'genome' or DNA molecule, with both interest and deep concern. In particular, when I learned that the original view that it contained about 120,000 'genes', each producing one protein, had been corrected by the Mega-Buck Human Genome Project to just 44,000 or so - I immediately balked and scoffed!

Why, science reckons the adult human body contains around 100,000,000,000 cells, all different! A sequence of 44,000 proteins is simply far too small to explain all that complexity! There MUST be, as my own thoughts in this paper would strongly suggest, in addition a strong SPIRITUAL aspect to DNA - operating in hidden 'spiritual' dimensions. In fact these dimensions must be multiplying up the complexity of the scientific view of the 'DNA/RNA genetic computer' two million times, probably much more. DNA must contain thoughts, to explain how treating a molecule even as vast as human DNA, as bio-chemicals only, completely fails to explain how human, and incidentally animal, complexity and above all consciousness, arise.

The rest of this paper, then gives first, a brief and necessarily simplistic description of the mechanism of production of complex proteins from sequences of amino-acids by RNA 'operating' on DNA molecules to unravel the 'genetic code'. Then it goes on to describe my 'spiritual' extensions to this purely biochemical theory.

It ends by suggesting various ways in which my own extensions would require vast amounts of research to 'prove'. Possibly lasting all the way into the 22^nd Century or even way beyond! In particular, how this research would need the development of a 'mind-reading or thought-reading instrument', which tongue in cheek, I will term a 'Spiritual Energy Analyser/Reader' (SEAR - pronounced 'seer' for short!) Early versions of just such a machine are being developed right now, I understand. However, they will almost certainly need years of development before they are precise and detailed enough to pick up spiritual energies and analyse their meaning from any part of the body, not just the obvious place, i.e. the brain!

So, the need for this final Paper emerges. In the body of the paper I have already challenged science to embody Mind and Spirit in its theories (to achieve a 'New Spiritual Physics' based on my "Spiritual Psychology"?) This provides a vastly more complex and to me convincing Biblical basis to intelligence than the 'logical intelligence' of computer 1's and 0's. Will 'Spiritual Computers' result? I complete this with 'Spiritual Biochemistry and so Biology'…

2. A necessarily potted and abridged summary of the current Scientific Model of how DNA and RNA super-molecules work to enable cells and organisms to reproduce

1. The chemical structures of DNA and RNA, and how these two types of supermolecule cooperate as they do, has been heavily researched since the 1950's, when two scientists, Frances Crick and James Watson, famously unravelled the now well-known 'double-helix' structure of DNA. DNA stands for deoxyribonucleic acid, and its cousin the simpler RNA, stands for ribonucleic acid. The structure of the simpler RNA molecule had been established for some time. To picture the far more complex and much longer DNA double-helix, a good analogy is to appreciate that a tape from an ordinary audio cassette has information from the A and B sides, found on either physical edge of the tape. Twist a long length of the tape so it forms a spiral, and the 'A and B' edges correspond to the double helix of DNA, in this analogy. RNA 'reads' this double helix 'genetic DNA tape' - just like the head of a tape recorder - to extract genetic information. Science to date believes this information is solely biochemical. My own view is somewhat broader, as we will see overleaf.

2. Just as along an audio cassette there are matching magnetised particles, holding the sound or voice, in pairs corresponding to the A and B sides, the vital information of the DNA molecule occurs in pairs - of chemicals called 'nucleotides' or 'bases'. There are, perhaps surprisingly only ever just four types of these bases that feature in the two strands of DNA in any double helix, known by their initial letters of C, U, A, and G (in full - cytosine, uracil, adenine and guanine).

3. It has been found that as the RNA 'head' works along the long DNA molecule, amino acids are produced, which are stitched together in the sequence given by the DNA 'genetic code' of bases. The RNA 'stitches together chemically' the sequence of amino acids (complex chemicals starting with a -COOH acid group and having an -NH2 amine tail, their distinguishing characteristic) into 'peptide chains' - the larger ones called proteins. It was shown back in the 1960's that it takes exactly three bases on a DNA chain to be read, for the RNA to make one amino acid. With some ingenious experiments, the correspondence between these combinations of three bases, and the amino acid that each such 'codon' codes for, was found to be:

1^st|2^nd

V ->

V 3^rd

PHE

LEU

SER

TYR

---

CYS

---

TRP

LEU

PRO

HIS

GLUN

ARG

ILEU

MET

THR

ASPN

LYS

SER

ARG

VAL

ALA

ASP

GLU

GLY

So the sixty-four combinations of the four bases into groups of three or 'codons', codes for just 20 amino acids, the significance of which comes out overleaf in my 'spiritual extension' to all this.. There is therefore considerable redundancy or 'degeneracy' in the codons. The codons U-A-A, U-G-A and U-A-G do not code for amino-acids at all, but represent 'genetic punctuation' like 'stop reading' and 'start reading'. U-A-G is the 'full stop' codon while capital letters are more complicated…

4. A set of codons or groups of three bases, each providing one amino acid or a piece of 'genetic punctuation', that yields one protein, is called a 'gene' - hence the name of the science of genetics. Cells can either 'replicate' to replace themselves with an identical cell before they die, when only their own DNA is used in the process to guarantee an identical copy is made. In sexual reproduction, one gene from one of each of the corresponding pair from each parent's DNA molecules is 'dominant' and is used, new research indicates usually the female - the other is ignored.

5. Every cell in a body is unique; yet the DNA is identical in each!

3. A summary - once more potted - of my 'Theory of Spiritual Genetics'. How it simply extends the current simpler purely biochemical model of science we just saw, yet with adequate research could result in both Science and Faith ending up much happier - with a return to the original Universal Spiritual View.

1. As we keep saying, the complexity of the human body, and likewise that of less complex creatures, cannot solely be explained as being put together, consciousness above all, with just 44,000 proteins, with just twenty types of amino-acids making them up. I claim the 'missing factor' is supplied by the body of this paper, and is purely spiritual.

2. My second hypothesis in this new theory is that each type of amino acid binds to itself a SPIRITUAL PHRASE with the twenty spiritual qualities of each of the twenty types being given by the 'Fundamental Spiritual Fruit'. So, given the future invention of a sufficiently accurate SEAR (or mind reading machine!) we should be able to establish the precise one-to-one relationship between each of the amino acids involved in genetics with the corresponding spiritual quality of the spiritual phrase it bonds to. Proteins are strongly associated and bonded to forms of RNA molecules called 'messenger RNA' and this research would need to establish how these are involved. So we need to find out how the two seemingly vastly disparate columns below are linked by twenty one-to-one relationships: -

Amino-acid Spiritual quality

1. PHE Jealousy for (Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil)

2. LEU Intuition (Tree of Life – Sophia, Wife of God)

3. ILEU Male Ultimate Quality (‘The Word’)

4. MET Female Ultimate Quality (‘The Law’)

5. VAL Way / Methodology (Truth leading to Life)

6. SER Notions of Heaven (Hope leading to Comfort)

7. PRO Reason

8. THR Creativity

9. ALA Generosity

10.TYR Mercy

11.HIS Pity

12.GLUN Endurance

13.ASPN Courage

14.LYS Wisdom

15.ASP Love

16.GLU Joy

17.CYS Health

18.TRP Peace

19.ARG Grace

20.GLY Beauty

3. If this new spiritual theory is correct, then, three DNA bases bind to one 'spiritual phrase'.

4. It is actually one protein per thought - or spiritual sentence, paragraph or even tome, depending on size. Proteins it is that bind, in this hypothesis, to thoughts, and must pass them on to other chemicals and 'organelles' in building new cells, so providing the real intelligence to build life - that is spiritual not biochemical energy in its nature… Such thoughts are much more complex than the underlying merely biochemical structures, although these in turn can be fearsomely complex, like proteins and DNA!

3. Scientific and spiritual theories of evolution

It is over 100 years since Charles Darwin wrote his famous Origin of Species, based on his observations on the diversity of newly-discovered species observed on his long trip around the Pacific. He claimed that it was evident that as each generation of all species came and went, species diversified and changed – or evolved – mostly in response to changes in their environment. This explained, he said, the great changes and diversity in species over millions of years, as observed in fossils by palaeontologists.

This notion was felt once more by the Church to be in direct conflict with the Biblical account in the Book of Genesis, and as for Galileo’s work in the early seventeenth century was condemned by many in the Church as pure heresy. In particular, Darwin’s view that mankind had in fact evolved from the apes instead of being ‘spontaneously created by God on the sixth Day’ was anathema! Personally, I feel that the notion of what a ‘day’ comprises in biblical accounts is very debatable, as we saw at the end of the previous article. I feel that the Church of that time was in fact guilty, yet again, of over-zealously defending a whole chauvinistic tradition founded on very little, if any, actual biblical evidence.

With the discovery of the structure of the ‘molecule of life’, DNA, in the late 1940’s, scientists felt that this offered the key to a biochemical justification and theoretical explanation for Darwin’s observations. However, fifty years on, much research has been undertaken, yet is still yet to produce the much-desired basis of understanding – in purely these ‘genetic terms’ – of how species diversify physically over time. The precise mechanism seems to involve, once more, more than just a physical set of processes.

Once in a while in the world of science, an enigmatic character appears who is capable of providing a radically different approach to such an impasse. Such a man was the world famous French biologist and palaeontologist, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who brought a perhaps, unique, perspective to his work on theories of physical and spiritual evolution – for he was also a Jesuit father.

He died in 1955, having provided a lifetime of brilliant work to his cause – of synthesising the two approaches to evolution of science and the religious world. I cannot help feeling that my own description of the two worlds of the spiritual and physical Universe, in the previous Paper, would have greatly interested him. This is, coming as it does some 60 years after the completion in 1948 of his epic book on the subject of different forms of evolution, “The Phenomenon of Man”.

In particular I feel he would have regarded with approval, my head-on assault in the previous Paper on the apparent total disparity between what he termed ‘inner energy’ – or spiritual energy – and external or physical energy.

Furthermore he would have been fascinated with one view I emerge with at the end of my Grand Synthesis there. This is that spiritual energy is indeed everywhere all the time, but occupies an invisible Universe ‘at right angles’ to the physical, observable one – and invisible because it is ‘rolled up within’ conventional space.

However, the advent of modern computers, which only really started to become established at the end of Teilhard’s life, allows us much enhanced opportunities of looking at the whole question of ‘what comprises intelligence, or psychic energy?’

Is it really a good idea to consider in the future trying to build a Really Useful Computer? One that does not just echo the thoughts of its programmers, after a great deal of labour and ‘trial and error’ in making the computer execute the programs correctly.

We are now thought not to be, as previously thought, the only species on Earth able to pride itself on an ability to think reflectively. Dolphins, whales and other primates have at least some measure of this supreme faculty. We are, however, unique in also having that vital digit, the thumb. In conjunction with our intellect, our thumbs have enabled us to develop great technologies and whole civilisations.

The question that is perhaps most asked in connection with the subject of evolution is how that ultimate biological organ, the brain, in particular the human brain, came to be. The evolutionary view is traditionally the same as an aspect of dialectical philosophy that I have not yet discussed.

Namely, from an enormously long and variegated series of quantitative changes in species, at last came a point in time when Teilhard’s ‘noosphere’ or the Bible’s Time of the End as discussed in this paper, became possible. Civilised man first emerged, it is widely thought, 12,000 years ago after the last Ice Age and for the first time made qualitative changes to his environment – with fire, the wheel, buildings and ultimately the first civilisations.

Dialectical thinkers usually argue that all dialectics proceed in this same way, with quantitative change and growth of things always being a necessary precursor to qualitative change. The physical aeons that preceded this vital point of the ‘beginning of the noosphere’, and the many lines of physical species that have led to mankind, comprise the ‘workshop of civilisation’.

However, it is perfectly possible to provide an antithesis to this dialectical thesis – of dialecticians! Namely that, as we saw is my view in the previous Paper, at the very Origin of Things, the qualitative world of ‘the Spirit’ either preceded, or occurred in parallel to, the physical world. As indeed the spiritual world turns out to be completely outside space and matter – it occupies a set of dimensions ‘at right angles to’ both space and in particular, matter– this whole notion indeed gets rather mystical.

However, logically speaking, spirit precedes the material world; furthermore, although initially it is ‘inferior’ to it and supports it, after the ‘noosphere’ first appeared men developed great religions that placed it firmly ‘on high’ and above.

So, the line of thought of my own particular synthesis of this dialectic, about the qualitative and quantitative natures of changes, comes to this.

The Holy Spirit can be seen from the argument in the previous Paper to have had a set of dimensions to live in, before or since time began, that intersect those of the physical world ‘at right angles’. To conclude an argument we need now that I only hinted at, at various points in the previous Paper, the spiritual dimensions by definition contain no matter – but psychic or Teilhardian ‘inner energy’. These, by virtue of Einstein’s insights, we can say gives the Holy Spirit a kind of spiritual mass. This then interacts with the physical world with the very familiar forces of gravity, and electromagnetic radiation – or light – to perhaps mould and change it?

The conclusion of this argument is that in synthesising religious and scientific views of evolution, my own conclusion comes down to a view that ‘All evolution is assisted evolution’.

The Holy Spirit, then, seems to have spent literally millions of years in assisting life on Earth to proceed towards an ultimate target – brains that in turn were sufficiently, and particularly, organised. So much so that they can, since civilisation started – and perhaps earlier for other species than our own, in the view of other religions like Buddhism – act as ‘vessels’ in the biblical sense; or, to borrow a phrase from my own field of electronic computers, as ‘amplifiers’ – for the Holy Spirit.

That is, the ultimate source of our reflective capacities is the Holy Spirit Herself. She seeks to introduce us to increasing amounts of Herself, or Himself in the traditional Christian view – which I challenged strongly in the previous article. The brain even mimics the ‘shape’ of the Holy Spirit!

The ‘soul’ most feel they have, is then the meeting point of their individual Spirit – the sum total of the Holy Spirit within each individual – with the Greater Body of the Holy Spirit.

The great differences between every single individual we ever meet, in that respect, can be assigned directly in this view, to the great variegation and structure I have already discussed at length in the previous Paper, of the Holy Spirit – as a set of spiritual dimensions. This is given totally uniquely via the ‘template of the soul’ to each and every living creature, so completely determining their unique individual character.

This is all about evolution – and as a scientist who studied genetics and heredity at Cambridge in my earlier studies, I fully accept evolution as a fully established mechanism for the ‘development of species’ over generations. However evolution cannot and does not set any targets for the resulting design. THAT is down to the Holy Spirit – GOD! There is a Panorama program of the famous atheist biologist Professor Richard Dawkins currently on You Tube on the Internet, proving that Darwinian evolution mechanisms produce systematic changes in species over many, many generations, with a primitive computer simulation. However Dawkins could not explain – Darwin could not explain either – how evolution produces ‘elegant, beautiful’ results. That is down to targets set by the HOLY SPIRIT alone – which they would both of course deny being the Ultimate Devout Fundamentalist Atheists!

This paper finally attributes the scientific fact according to a recent famous genetics book ‘the Seven Eves’ (I think it is called that) that all of modern humanity is descended from just seven pairs of people. If you are scientifically minded – only seven pairs of homo sapiens survived the Ice Age 12,000 years ago. According to the Bible, in Genesis, Noah and his wife and their three sons on the Ark, were joined by just three other couples to make seven pairs of all ‘good’ species on the Ark, if you care to read it carefully. Either way, if you equate the End of the last Ice Age, as I do, to The Biblical Flood, it was an Act of God. One which wiped out all the other humanoids science has said frequently, were wiped out then, such as homo erectus, Neanderthal Man, etc, etc. The Bible says they were corrupt – the ‘Act of God’ either way you look at it, certainly paved the way for us homo sapiens as the only people. OUR AGE is about 6,000-12,000 years since then (scientific estimates are inconclusive – but AGREES with the Bible) but the AGE OF THE UNIVERSE according to ASTRONOMY is over fourteen THOUSAND MILLION YEARS!

5. The true lengths of time of the Creations, of both the Universe and of mankind

There has been a continual debate between theologians and scientists since science began, about the likely age of the Universe and the length of the history of mankind. The purpose of the present section is to show that there is in fact no contradiction between the few statements in the Bible on the question of either age, and the discoveries of scientists.

Both religion and science now talk of a ‘beginning of time’, though scientists debated this amongst themselves for hundreds of years, whereas the Bible talks of an initial Creation of the Universe by God. Furthermore, the order of events described in the first chapter of the Book of Genesis, although deliberately very terse, is not greatly at variance with the much more detailed evidence of science.

However, there the similarities apparently end. Astronomers and cosmologists have shown that there are literally billions of stars and almost certainly planets in our own Galaxy, and moreover billions of such Galaxies in the Universe. This compares with the ten thousand or so stars visible in biblical times. They estimate from their complex calculations that the Universe is about fifteen BILLION years old (15,000,000,000 years). This seems to most people to conflict starkly with the Bible’s Seven Days of Creation, with mankind appearing on the sixth day. The Bible itself, however, provides the answer to this apparent contradiction:

‘...with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day.’

2 Peter 3:8

If a day to God can seem like a thousand years, then likewise a million or a billion years (or so) can seem like a Day. So it seems quite plausible that God’s Seven Days of Creation each lasted millions or billions of years, so agreeing with the scientific age of the Universe.

6. All language, thoughts, emotions and feelings, are encapsulated in microscopic ‘transcendental building blocks’

‘Nice thoughts’ – ‘male and female’, in both men and women – occupy very elegant ‘hyper-cubes within hyper-cubes’; which is reflected in Far Eastern traditions, especially Buddhism. All of our sublime or spiritual thoughts occupy dodecahedrons.

‘Sick’ thoughts, by contrast, fill jarring, nasty, triangular pyramids.

Our brain and nervous system are designed, naturally enough, to operate far better with cubic, ‘nice’, or ‘normal’, and also dodecahedral or ‘sublime’ or ‘spiritual’ thoughts – than with their opposite – ‘nasty triangular pyramids’…

I was inspired to start writing this section of this paper, some years ago, after watching the first episode of a new series on BBC 2 television, called ‘Brain Story’. I promptly wrote about this book, and sent a copy to the programme’s narrator, Professor Susan Greenfield. The letter included the above summary, and the following paragraphs: -

I am writing to you after watching your ‘Brain Story’ programme on BBC2 last night, which was very interesting. It has always fascinated me, when I was a Scholar of King’s College, Cambridge, studying maths, physics, and computer science, and since as a Chartered Instrument Engineer, that tera-bucks have been randomly ‘lobbed’ at the problem of artificial intelligence for fifty years. The result is only a very disappointing yet massive collection of instruments with no sign of any consciousness – and an IQ of precisely zero – even less given their terrible fragility – NEGATIVE IQ!!?? Their problems are the bane of the lives of many!

As a person with a deep faith that I am completely at ease with, having given it many years of thought, I can tell that by contrast, you come from the vast majority of scientists that are what I call ‘devout Atheists’ – especially true among scientists? You have all missed a key point – that God’s ‘Acts of Creation’ continue forever, all the time, everywhere – because God – in the guise of The Holy Spirit – acts everywhere, all the time… I feel you should take a hard look at my own attached book that explains all this. I should very much like to hear your reaction…

The brain of all living creatures is a tera-compact, above all conscious organ of thought, measurement and control. How anybody can possibly imagine it ‘somehow threw itself together in “evolving” by ““random chance””’, when by sheer contrast to people like me it is “God’s supreme Creation!” – the very Seat of Soul, Spirit and Mind – i.e. consciousness – is totally beyond me! If such an incredible organ, way beyond the current wit of man to build anything like a computer even vaguely approaching it, is the result of ‘evolution’ i.e. ‘monkeys typing Shakespeare’ – why is humankind manifestly completely unable to manufacture a conscious brain – even that of a nematode worm?

I was very stimulated by the TV programme, although as above, rather put off that the whole subject was treated totally by ‘Atheist Materialist Scientists’ who rather tried to explain away spiritual experiences, even, as mere brain activity i.e. purely material.

The challenge was on after I posted that letter back in July 2000. I had already realised that this book up to this point has talked about Mind and Spirit with hardly a mention of the brain itself. The onus was now on me, I felt, to bring this book to a head, and in this Part to actually attempt the long dreamed-for impossible – to give a non-material basis for thought, especially in relation to the brain. Within just twenty-four hours of posting my letter, I had been through sufficient of literally, a brainstorm, to bring the present book together and end it with a view of how mind and brain coexist…

I claim about the brain that it contains ‘our portion’ of the Holy Spirit. I will now be claiming that all our thoughts, feelings, emotions and moods are complex yet extraordinarily microscopic fragments of Spirit, and that: -

The brain is “a spirit-processing and spirit-memorising machine”

‘Normal’ or ‘square’ people, as the hippies called them, usually experience a pleasant-feeling mixture of ‘cubic-shaped’ thoughts, or ‘nice thoughts’, which are a subset of the overall Holy Spirit, so can be either ‘male’ or ‘female’. Each cubic thought is composed of spiritual dimensions containing spiritual flows. The two male and female ‘sets of dimensions’ are totally different, yet complement one another perfectly. We all get a mixture of male and female thoughts, the balance largely dependent on the balance of our sexuality. God designed cubic brain cells so that cubic thoughts can fit precisely and so totally comfortably, physically, inside them.

Cubic thoughts can be compound, and very quickly get vastly complicated, by containing other cubic thoughts ‘stacked within them’. Such compound hyper-cubes need bigger brain cells to hold them. To see the complexity, look at the ‘toy’ of a Rubik’s cube – that holds just 27 ‘cubes within cubes’ – but I for one am totally beaten by it, as are the majority of adults. Somehow children ‘get the hang of’ Rubik’s cube, on the whole, far faster than us poor adults…

We can draw these, as I have already hinted several times in this book. By total contrast, spiky, uncomfortable, ‘bad thoughts’ are pyramidal and made of nasty, sharp, triangles that jar with the cells in the brain. Finally, some people experience neutral, male-and-female, thoughts, which turn out to, surprise, surprise, perhaps, immediately produce a ‘child i.e. male/female’ as well. The results are rhapsodic ‘spiritual thoughts’. These contain all eight of the ‘jealous for’ and all eight of the ‘anima’ spirits of Part 5 of this Volume A of this book. Also, they instantly produce the ‘child’ spirits above – of the Son and the Bride.

So overall ‘spiritual thoughts’ are very complex indeed, being made of all of the first twenty-four spiritual dimensions in dodecahedrons, nearly round objects with a high degree of symmetry, with twenty triangular faces. The four ‘People’ of Being (Jealousy ‘for’), the Holy Spirit or Anima, Jesus and Ariel, fill such thoughts to make up the full 24 dimensions, again totally holistically and four-square! If cubic thoughts fit cubic brain and nerve cells easily, then rounded spiritual thoughts fit very comfortably, explaining physical feelings of spiritual warmth, rhapsody, awe and wonder, expressed by the Faithful…

Before going any further, I had better sketch out all four of this total of four ‘possibilities of thoughts’ we can have. Do they correspond to the ‘four bases of the genetic code of DNA’?

MALE thought JEALOUSY FOR